Result of U.P. Higher Judicial Service (Main Written) Examination, 2014 Direct Recruitment to U.P. Higher Judicial Service held on 14th, 15th and 16th November, 2014 has been declared. High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur notified Advertisement for recruitment additional district judges through M.P. Higher Judicial Service (Entry Level) Direct Recruitment for BAR, Exam 2015 Haryana Judicial Services Examination 2014-Pre is conducted on 10th of Jan 2015. The result is awaited. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI will hold examination for direct recruitment against 14 vacancies to Delhi Higher Judicial Service on Sunday, the 06th April,2014-Last Date 06.02.2014 13/11/2013: While renewing the term of the appointment of the existing incumbents the State Government is required to consider their past performance and conduct in the light of the recommendations made by the District Judges and the District Magistrates. Therefore, the High Court could not have issued a Mandamus for renewal of the term of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and other similarly situated persons and thereby frustrated the provisions of LR Manual and Section 24 Cr.P.C .- SUPREME COURT.
HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT
Go Back to High Court Judgements
  Date 4/17/2009 7:35:00 PM
  Court
  Parties
  Appeal -
  Act -
  Judgement
  Criminal Appeal No. 5073 of 2008 Surendra Singh Vs. State of U.P. Hon. Shiv Charan,J. Hon. Vijay Kumar Verma,J. (Delivered by Hon. Vijay Kumar Verma,J). .....although we find force in the contention of Sri Rathore that overt act by all the accused persons is not essential to attract section 34 IPC and if any criminal act is done by several persons in furtherance of the common intention of all, each of such persons is liable for that act in the same manner as it were done by him alone, but in our considered opinion, applying this principle of law bail should not be refused, if otherwise a case for granting bail is made out. Therefore, on the basis of aforesaid principle of criminal jurisprudence, bail should not be refused in present case to the appellant Surendra Singh, because according to the first statement of star witness Ravindra Singh (injured), recorded in Sahara Hospital, Gwaliar on 25.03.2006 at 11.00 p.m., the accused Surendra Singh did not fire in the incident. According to Dr. M.P. Baruwa (P.W.12), the statement of Ravindra Singh was recorded in Sahara Hospital Gwaliar on 25.03.2006 by Dr. P.C. Saxena. The statement recorded on paper No. 9A/2 has been proved by P.W.12, recognizing the handwriting of Dr. P.C. Saxena. In our opinion, the statement recorded on paper No. 9 Ka/2 by Dr. P.C. Saxena on 25.03.2006 at the time of admission of injured Ravindra Singh in Sahara Hospital Gwaliar is admissible as his previous statement under section 145 and 157 of Indian Evidence Act. In his statement recorded in trial court as P.W. 2, the injured Ravindra Singh has admitted at page 13 of his statement that paper No. 9Ka/2 bears his signature. It is further admitted by this witness on the same page that doctor had recorded his statement. ....