Result of U.P. Higher Judicial Service (Main Written) Examination, 2014 Direct Recruitment to U.P. Higher Judicial Service held on 14th, 15th and 16th November, 2014 has been declared. High Court of Madhya Pradesh, Jabalpur notified Advertisement for recruitment additional district judges through M.P. Higher Judicial Service (Entry Level) Direct Recruitment for BAR, Exam 2015 Haryana Judicial Services Examination 2014-Pre is conducted on 10th of Jan 2015. The result is awaited. THE HIGH COURT OF DELHI will hold examination for direct recruitment against 14 vacancies to Delhi Higher Judicial Service on Sunday, the 06th April,2014-Last Date 06.02.2014 13/11/2013: While renewing the term of the appointment of the existing incumbents the State Government is required to consider their past performance and conduct in the light of the recommendations made by the District Judges and the District Magistrates. Therefore, the High Court could not have issued a Mandamus for renewal of the term of respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and other similarly situated persons and thereby frustrated the provisions of LR Manual and Section 24 Cr.P.C .- SUPREME COURT.
HIGH COURT JUDGEMENT
Go Back to High Court Judgements
  Date 4/16/2009 7:07:00 PM
  Court
  Parties
  Appeal -
  Act -
  Judgement
  ICICI BANK Vs. SHANTI DEVI SHARMA & ORS: SUPEREME COURT: TARUN CHATTERJEE, DALVEER BHANDARI j.j., dated 15/05/2008 [Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No. 4935 of 2006] Recovery of loans or seizure of vehicles can only be done through legal means- Lenders/Banks not to resort to use of muscle power for recovery of loans and persistently bothering borrower at odd hours - Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002 - Security Interest (Enforcement) Rules, 2002 - RBI Guidelines on Fair Practices Code for Lenders dated 5.5.2003 - Guideline (v)(c) - Guidelines on Engagements of Recovery Agents dated 24.4.2008. Prosecution case was that son of respondent committed suicide as a result of harassment and humiliation caused to him by the appellants bank recovery agents. The respondent filed a writ petition seeking for directions to the Commissioner of Police to take action against the appellant-bank. High Court ordered the Police to file reports as to the status of the investigation against the bank. The High Court later reviewed the two status reports that were filed by the Police. It found them unsatisfactory and accordingly, directed the Investigating Officer to conclude the investigation into the matter as expeditiously as possible and take necessary action against those found guilty of abetting the deceased to commit suicide. In addition, the High Court stated the proximate cause of death of the deceased that led him to commit suicide was on account of humiliation caused by the Bank people from where loan was taken by him; and the modus-operandi employed by the banks for realization of their loan amount and for recovering the possession of the vehicle against which loans are given was not legal. The appellant bank filed applications for impleadment as well as for clarification/deletion/modification under s.482 Cr.P.C. According to the appellant bank, the observations made by the High Court were unjustified and unnecessary for deciding the case. In an order dated 11.8.2006, the High Court declined to expunge the impugned observations on the ground that they were made consciously, however clarified the matter by stating that any observation made against appellant Bank would not influence or affect the proceedings, if any, taken against the said bank or its employees. Appellant-Bank filed the present appeal.